Monday, 13 December 2010

A letter to the MSP's of The Scottish Parliament


Dear Sirs,

I write to voice my objection to the proposed changes to the law in relation to the purchase of sex in Scotland, ie : the private member's bill being proposed by Trish Godman. My name is Laura and I am an independent escort. I am not pimped, coerced or working under duress in any way. I am not labouring under any addiction, nor am I the product of an abusive background. I have been a sex worker for some 16 years and it's fair to say I love my job.

The first part of Trish Godman's opening statement makes for interesting reading ;

"People who buy sex do so of their own free will, whereas the majority of prostitutes are unwilling participants in this exchange of cash for sex."

Of what "majority" does she speak, exactly ? Over the years I have met women working at every level of the sex industry and in fact, it has been my experience that the vast majority of those women are happy in their work. Sure, there are days we dislike, the same as every other job, but the only women I have ever encountered who are truly unhappy are those who are drug addicted, or trapped through fear. This proposed legislative change does not take the above into account in any way, it seeks to prohibit the purchase of sex regardless of any circumstances.

Ms. Godman goes on to say ;

"Until the purchasers of sex are criminalised, individuals, families and communities will still suffer and organised crime profit."

How does my job supply "organised crime" ? I work perfectly legally, I pay my taxes and my national insurance and in fact the only people to benefit from the proceeds of my work ( aside from myself ) are the government, in collecting revenue.

Turning to Ms. Godman's next point -

"Some women have paid traffickers to bring them to a new country with the promise of a new life, while others are taken, for example, from poor families. Once trafficked, some women are forced into prostitution and denied contact with their families becoming “invisible” in the new country and denied access to services such as health care they may need. Most are tightly controlled with no freedom. Increasing isolation, fear and language difficulties make it hard to ask for help and escape their situation."

At last, a point on which Ms. Godman and I agree.

No right thinking person in this country would support the trafficking of women as little more than cattle, the practice is abhorrent and the full force of the law should be brought down on those found guilty. For me though, the crux of the matter is this - clandestine activity can only thrive in clandestine conditions. If the sex industry were to be fully decriminalised then it would be increasingly difficult for those who seek to abuse women to operate their despicable operations.

Amongst all of the horror stories of trafficking ( and let's make no mistake about it, it does exist ) there is also a community of sex workers like myself who truly enjoy our jobs and bring happiness into the lives of many men ( and women ) who may be widowed, disabled or in simple terms, lonely.

I say that the solution to the current issue of trafficked women ( and men ) is not to persecute those who choose to enter into consensual sex for payment but rather, to concentrate on those who are working against their will.

Ms. Godman seems to draw a lot of her information from Ann Hamilton and Glasgow City Council. To my mind it is simply not possible to "reduce demand" for sexual services. Ms. Hamilton would have us believe that reducing demand for such services is the way forward in reducing harm to sex workers. I submit that the correct approach is to look at reducing harm to sex workers by taking the stigma and the social exclusion away from the sex industry, so that both sex workers and clients can feel able to come forward and voice any concerns that they may have to the authorities. If the true aim of the proposed legislative changes is to protect the vulnerable within the sex industry then that is the only way forward.

As a woman who passionately believes in the rights of sex workers and also in the rights of women as a whole, I am more than happy to meet you and discuss what I have proposed.

In the meantime, I thank you for taking the time to read my submission and look forward to hearing from you.

Yours faithfully,

Laura Lee.

13 comments:

  1. Hi Laura
    first of all i would like to say im in the the political realm
    i do not agree with this bill that Ms. Godman
    is tabling As it would do more damage than good by driving it under ground
    i think you are right in saying that if you legalise the profession and would help to stop the trafficking

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Laura xx

    I had my follow-up interview with Eaves on Monday. Out of 100 sex workers interviewed, only 12 were Independents willing to talk. We need more ladies to come forward if we want to see any changes.

    I would like to contact Helen and put your name forward for any researches in the future.

    Please let me know if this is ok for you.

    Indian Delight Jasmin xx

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Jas,

    No problem, you can give her my details and I'll talk to her.

    L xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. oops! Sorry. I meant I will email HER, not here! lol

    ReplyDelete
  5. Edinburgh Evening News Article
    Ms.Godman has got it all wrong and well done in your positive efforts to correct that misinformation and bring some reality to the discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  6. did you ever think about going into politics
    well done keep up the good work

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hahaha, I could call it "The Cunnilingus Coalition". Not for me I'm afraid, but thank you for your kind comments. :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well done, Laura - very well put.

    S.xx

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bloody good blog, (as always) Laura. Here's hoping that you get a reply other than a standard email/letter saying that they have received your communication and will be in touch shortly, blah blah blah...

    xxx

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.